Tuesday, January 8, 2013

MEMORANDUM SUBMITTED TO SHRI KAPIL SIBAL, HON`BLE MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS & IT BY NFPE ON 08 th JANUARY, 2013


MEMORANDUM SUBMITTED TO SHRI KAPIL SIBAL, HON`BLE MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS & IT BY NFPE ON 08 th JANUARY, 2013

No. NFPE/GENL/2013                                                                        Dated  07 -01-2013

To
Sri. Kapil Sibal,
Hon’ble Minister for Communications & IT,
Government of India,
New Delhi - 110 001.

Respected Sir,

Sub: Submission of memorandum - Request for grant of time for a meeting with   Hon’ble Minister (C).

This memorandum is submitted with the most fervent hope that your goodself will be condescend to intercede on our behalf to settle the following problems of the Postal and RMS employees including Gramin Dak Sevaks (GDS).

1.         (a) Grant of Civil Servant status to the Gramin Dak Sevaks and extending all  
           benefits of the departmental employees to GDS.

(b) Enhancement of Bonus ceiling to 3,500/-, Revision of cash handling norms, Full protection of monthly wages (TRCA), Introduction of Health Scheme, Removal of 50 points condition for compassionate appointments, Filling up of GDS Mailman posts.

2.         Stop abolition of about 17093 posts for the year 2005 to 2008 ordered as per Department of Posts OM No.25-12/2008-PE-1 dated 19-11-2012 and restoration of all abolished posts.

3.         Revision of wages of Casual, Part-time and contingent employees with effect from 01-01-2006.

4.         Remove the restriction of 5% imposed on compassionate appointments and grant of compassionate appointments in all eligible cases as being done in Railways.

5.         Cadre restructuring of Group-C, Postmen, Mailguard and MTS employees of Department of Posts.

6.         Revision of Overtime Allowance rates.

7.         Abnormal delay in grant of HSG-I promotion to eligible officials. An explanatory note on each issues mentioned above is also enclosed herewith as Annexure-I.

We most humbly request the Hon’ble Minister to be kind enough to grant us time for a meeting to present our views on the above items before the
Hon’ble  Minister.

Awaiting favourable response,


Yours faithfully,

M. Krishnan,
Secretary General, NFPE.

Annexure-I
EXPLANATORY NOTE ON ITEMS MENTIONED IN THE
MEMORANDUM.
I. (a) Grant of Civil Servant Status to Gramin Dak Sevaks (GDS) and extension of all service benefits of departmental employees to GDS:

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in its landmark judgement (Rajamma’s case AIR 1977 - SC 1677) has declared that the Extra Departmental Agents (ED Agents - now called as Gramin Dak Sevaks) employed by the Postal Department, though they are not employed on whole-time basis, are holders of civil posts. The Court further ordered that they cannot be termed as “agents” because of their relationship with the Government which is that of master and servant. But the Department of Posts still describes them as agents/sevaks and is not ready to confer “departmental status” on them and to extend all the benefits of the departmental employees to them. The observation made by the Fourth Central Pay Commission headed by Hon’ble Justice Singhal on this issue, is reproduced below, to expose the illegal stand taken by the Postal Department to deny the departmental status to the Gramin Dak Sevaks (formerly ED Agents).

OBSERVATIONS MADE BY FOURTH CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION:

“A letter was received from the Ministry of Communications (P&T Board) for exclusion of Extra Departmental Agents, numbering about three lakhs, from the purview of our inquiry. It was stated that the system of Extra-Departmental Agents was peculiar to the P&T organisation and was designed to extend postal facilities in rural and backward areas where opening of regular departmental Post Office was not justified due to inadequate workload. The remuneration and the conditions of service of Extra Departmental Agents were also different from those of regular employees. The Third Pay Commission accepted the view that Extra Departmental Agents were not holders of civil posts and decided to exclude them from its purview.

The matter is, however, beyond controversy after the decision of Supreme Court in Gokulananda’s case where it has been declared that an Extra Departmental Agents is not a casual worker but “holds a post under the administrative control of the state” and that while such a post is outside the regular civil services, there is no doubt that it is a post under the “state”. In view of this pronouncement, we were unable to accept the contention that Extra Departmental Employees were outside the purview of the terms of our Commission. They, no doubt, have their own peculiar conditions of service and, in that sense, their case is somewhat special. We therefore could not exclude them from our consideration, but we accepted the Government’s suggestion for
setting up of a one-man committee to look into their conditions of service as was done by the second and third Pay Commissions”. From the above observations, it is crystal clear that the Fourth Pay Commission has concluded that the ED Agents are Civil Servants even though they are kept outside the regular civil service.

OBSERVATIONS MADE BY JUSTICE CHARANJITTALWARCOMMITTEE

In the year 1997, the one man committee appointed by the Government, headed by Retired Justice Charanjit Talwar, to examine the wages and service
conditions of the Extra Departmental Agents, made the following recommendations in its report submitted to the Government. 1. “Extra Departmental Agents have to be included within the overall class of Civil Servants, being holders of civil posts. They can be grouped as “Additional” to the departmental employees but they cannot be classified as a class apart from the civil servants. At any rate they cannot be classified with the sole object of not granting them benefits which accrue to a departmental employee”.

2.         “The plea taken by the Department before the Second and Third Pay Commission and also before various learned Tribunals that ED Agents are a class apart is entirely misconceived. It is violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution”.

3.         “It is not the case of the Department of Posts that in fact a contract of agency between the ED Agent and the Government is executed. It is also not their case, as it cannot be because of the Supreme Court Judgements, that the relationship between the Department and the ED Agent is that of Principal and Agent...... The result of the above discussion is that ED Agents have to be held to be Civil Servants not only for the purpose of Article 311(2) but also as contemplated under Article 311(1). Logically, therefore ED Agents come within the purview of Article 309 of the Constitution”.

The repeated attempt to read Article 311(2) in isolation is entirely misconceived and untenable. ED Agents who are being treated as “outside the regular service” and not to be considered as Civil Servants excepting for the purpose of disciplinary inquiry is unfortunate and is a symbol of continuous exploitation.

We request the Hon’ble Minister that the injustice done to the Gramin Dak Sevaks (formerly called as ED Agents) all along may please be undone by:

(i)         Declaring the Gramin Dak sevaks as holders of Civil Servant Status and

(ii)        to extend them all the benefits of the departmental employees, such as Pay (now granted only Allowance), Leave (now Earned Leave, Casual Leave, Half Pay leave not granted) Pension, Statutory Gratuity, Advances, Medical Claim, Time bound Promotions, LTC etc. etc.

1. (b)(i) Enhancement of Bonus ceiling - In the matter of enhancement of Bonus Ceiling of Gramin Dak Sevaks, it was assured by Postal Board that another attempt will be made to send the case for approval of the Finance Ministry. It is learnt that Finance Ministry has not approved the proposal, instead sent the file back directing the Department of Posts to reexamine the issue by another committee. It is further learnt that even if the Department submits another proposal after revised study by a Committee, it will be considered for the Financial Year 2013 - 2014 only (ie. next financial year). Hon’ble Minister’s intervention is requested to get justice to the Gramin Dak Sevaks in the Bonus issue.

(ii) Revision of Cash handling norms - On the issue of withdrawl of upward change in cash handling norms, it was assured by the Postal Board that the issue will be re-examined. Minister of Communications for State has also assured the staff side that needful will be done in this case. A committee under the Chairmanship of DDG (Estt.) was also constituted to re-examine the issues arising out of enhancement of cash handling norms. It is requested that the cash handling norms may be reduced to Rs.4,000/- per point instead of Rs.20,000/- per point.

(iii) Ensuring no reduction of wages (TRCA) under any circumstances - It was assured by Minister of Communications for State that positive orders will be issued for full protection of wages (TRCA) of Gramin Dak Sevaks. A committee under the Chairmanship of DDG (Estt) was also constituted to examine the issue.Unfortunately the orders issued by the Department gives protection of TRCA only for one year. Our request is that the existing wages (TRCA) of Gramin Dak Sevaks shall not be reduced under any circumstances. As per the existing orders whenever workload comes down the wages (TRCA) will be protected only for one year and after that existing wages will be reduced.

(iv) Introduction of Health Scheme
It was assured by the Postal Board that the demand for introduction of Health scheme for Gramin Dak Sevaks is accepted by Government in principle. But till this date, the scheme is not implemented. As a result Gramin Dak Sevaks are denied the benefit of Medical reimbursement.

(v) Removal of minimum 50 points condition for compassionate appointment.

(vi)  Filling up of all vacant posts of GDS Mailman posts in RMS.

3. Stop abolition of about 17093 posts for the year 2005 to 2008 and restore all the posts abolished:

Department of Posts has recently issued an order No.25-12/2008-PE-1 dated 19-11-2012 abolishing about 17093 posts in different cadres for the year 2005 to 2008. Earlier the Department has assured that efforts will be made to get the approval of the Finance Ministry for filling up these posts, by exempting the Department of posts from the purview of Government orders on the subject. Unlike other department, Department of Posts is an operative department having day-to-day dealings with the general public (customers) through counter services and also through delivery staff. Arbitrary abolition of large scale operative posts will badly effect the day-to-day functioning of the Post offices and will badly tell upon the efficiency of the Postal Services. In most of the offices workload has increased manifold. Department has earlier abolished about 20000 posts for the year from 2001 to 2005. Again 17093 posts are being abolished for the year 2005-2008. We request the Hon’ble Minister to stop abolition of 17093 posts now ordered for abolition and also restore the posts already abolished.

3. Revision of wages of casual, part-time and contingent employees.

Hon’ble Supreme Court has already ordered regulating the wages of the casual workers at the rate of 1/30th of the pay at the minimum of the relevant pay scale plus dearness allowance for the work of eight hours per day. Accordingly after implementation of the 5th CPC recommendations, the Department of Posts has issued orders for payment of pro-rata wages to casual, part-time, contingent employees with effect from 01-01-1996, duly approved by the Department of Personnel & Training vide Order No.1-3/97-PAP dated 03-11-1998. But similar orders are not issued after the implementation of sixth CPC recommendations. The sixth CPC recommendations are implemented with effect from 01-01-2006 and orders were issued in the year 2008. Now four years are over, but still the wages of the casual labourers are not revised at par with sixth CPC pay scales. We request the Hon’ble Minister to issue necessary directions to the Secretary, Department of Posts, in this regard.

4. Remove the restriction of 5% condition imposed on compassionate appointments:

On the plea of Supreme Court directive, the Government introduced a 5% ceiling on the compassionate appointments. When the matter was taken up by the staff side in the National Council JCM the Government was unable to produce any such directive from the Supreme Court. Despite that the official side refused to withdraw the said instructions limiting the compassionate appointments to 5% of the available vacancies. It is pertinent to mention in this connection that the compassionate appointments in the Railways which is also a Central Government Department continue to be operated without any such 5% restrictions. The standing committee on with effect from Department of Personnel in one of their report has termed the scheme of compassionate appointment as a sacred assurance to a fresh entrant that if he dies in harness his family shall not be left in lurch. Such an assurance is being breached by the provisions of limiting such appointments to 5% of Direct Recruitment vacancies. It has to be done away with. We therefore urge the Hon’ble Minister that direction may be issued to do away with this stipulation and compassionate appointments be given to all deserving candidates.

5. Cadre Restructuring of Group-C, Postmen, Mailguard and MTS in
various arms of Department of Posts:

After marathon discussions on all the problems put forth by the staff side in a strike charter of demands, the Secretary, Department of Posts in the written minutes of the discussion held on 10-1-2012 & 12-1-2012 interalia stated as follows:

 “As recorded in the minutes of the meeting held on 27-12-2011, the proposal is under consideration of a committee under the chairpersonship of DDG(P). The staff side expressed their concern about undue delay in finalisation of the proposal on which the Chairperson desired finalisation of this process by 31st March 2012. It was assured that the timelines would be adhered to”. Again in minutes of the discussions held by the staff side on 21-05-2012, Secretary, Posts further assured as follows”

“It was decided to formulate a proposal by 30th June 2012 for further examination in consultation with the nodal ministries.” In spite of the above mentioned repeated assurances the cadre restructuring proposal is not yet finalised. The undue and unwarranted delay is causing a concern and strong resentment among the employees. We request the Hon’ble Minister to take action for speedy finalisation of the cadre restructuring proposal.

6. Revision of overtime allowance (OTA) rates

Overtime allowance is granted when employees are ordered to do work
beyond their duty hours with certain stipulated conditions. The overtime allowance is last revised in the year 1987. Thereafter no revision took place. The Board of Arbitration appointed under the JCM scheme having found the unreasonable position taken by the Government gave out the award in favour of the employees and directed the Government to revise the OTA whereby OTA will be linked to the actual pay of the Government employees. The Government has not implemented this award till date. We request the Hon’ble Minister take necessary action to get the OTA rates revised.

7. Abnormal delay in grant of HSG-I promotions to eligible officials

HSG-I promotion is not being granted to eligible officials for the last four
years. The reason stated by the Department of Posts is that the new HSGI Recruitment rules are under issue and hence the holding of DPC for HSG-I promotions are kept in abeyance. This reply is being repeated for the last three years. Our request to grant HSG-I promotions as per the existing Recruitment rules and fil up all the vacancies has not yet been considered favourably. The revised recruitment rules can be applied prospectively from the date of issue of the Revised Recruitment Rules (RRR) and the existing vacancies can be filled up by holding DPC as per the existing Recruitment rules. We request the Hon’ble Minister to issue necessary directions to the Department of Posts in this regard, as many senior officials are retiring every month without getting their due promotions and consequent increase in pension, for no fault of them.

source:http://nfpe.blogspot.in/
For latest updates 
Always visit http://satish24k.blogspot.com 
Share and Care

Central Government Gazetted Officers’ Organizations demands SEVENTH CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION.(7th CPC)


Central Government Gazetted Officers’ Organizations demands SEVENTH CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION.(7th CPC)

Gazetted officers put forth their demands
The first convention of Confederation of Central Government Gazetted Officers’ Organizations, Tamil Nadu Region, passed a number of resolutions, including ‘Revision of wages of Central Government Employees with effect from January 1, 2011 by setting up the Seventh Central Pay Commission and every five years thereafter.

The meeting which was held at Sir Pitty Thiyagaraya Hall, T. Nagar, urged the Centre consider the merger of Dearness Allowance with Pay for all purposes including pension with effect from January 1. The other demands, creation of a separate Joint Consultative Machinery for Gazetted Officers of Central Government Departments; at least three promotions after induction into the Gazetted Officer’s Cadre; and bonus for all Gazetted Officers.

Representatives of the Gazetted Officers from all over Tamil Nadu participated in the convention. Member of Parliament S.S. Rama Subbu inaugurated the convention and delivered the inaugural address. Member of Parliament and Member, Standing Committee on Ministry of Defence, T.K. Rangarajan, who attended the convention as distinguished guest, delivered the felicitation speech.

S. Mohan, Convener of the confederation delivered the welcome address and presented a declaration.

S. Chandrasekar, All India Central Excise Gazetted Officers’ Association and I. B. Mishra, Secretary General, All India Customs Preventive Service Federation, addressed the gathering and stressed on the need for unity among the Group B Officers and called upon the government to pay attention to their genuine grievances.

Rajesh D. Menon, Secreatry General, All India Income Tax Gazetted Officers Association, deliberated on the future road map the confederation.

Source:The hindu
For latest updates 
Always visit http://satish24k.blogspot.com 
Share and Care

Monday, January 7, 2013

Fixation of pay on promotion to a post carrying higher duties and responsibilities but carrying the same grade pay


Finmin Orders 2013 : Fixation of pay on promotion to a post carrying higher duties and responsibilities but carrying the same grade pay

No.10/02/2011.E.III/A
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Expenditure

New Delhi, the 7th January, 2013

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject:- Fixation of pay on promotion to a post carrying higher duties and responsibilities but carrying the same grade pay.

The undersigned is directed to invite an attention to the provisions contained in Rule 13 of the CCS(RP) Rules, 2008, which provides for the method of fixation of pay on promotion on or after 1.1.2006 in case. inter-alia, of promotion from one grade pay to another. The Rule provides for fixation of pay by way of addition of one increment equal to 3% of the sum of the pay in the pay band and the existing grade pay (rounded off to the next multiple of 10)to the existing pay in the pay band and then fixing the pay in the promotional post as per the procedure prescribed therein.

2. In terms of this Ministry’s OM No. 169/2/2000-IC dated 24.11.2000, dealing with the situation whereby both the feeder and the promotional grades were placed in the identical revised pay scales based on the recommendations of the 5th Central Pay Commission, it was provided, inter-alia, that only in cases where it was not found feasible to appropriately restructure cadres in question on functional, operational and administrative considerations, extension of the benefit of fixation of pay under FR 22(I)(a)(1) could be considered on the merits of each case, provided all the conditions precedent for the grant of this benefit were fully satisfied and promotion to the post in question actually involved assumption of higher responsibilities.

3. In view of the provisions which existed prior to 1.12006., the matter has been considered and the President is pleased to decide that in cases of promotion from one post to another where the promotional post carries the same Grade Pay as the feeder post, the fixation of pay in such cases will be done in the manner as prescribed in Rule 13(i) of the CCS(RP) Rules, 2008, provided fixation of pay in such cases was done prior to 1.1.2006 in terms of this Ministry’s aforesaid OM No.169/2/2000-IC dated 24 11.2000.

4. In so far as the persons serving the Indian Audit and Account Department are concerned, these orders are issued in consultation with the Comptroller & Auditor General of India.

5. The Hindi version of this OM will follow.

sd/-
(Amar Nath Singh)
Deputy Secretary to the Government of India



For latest updates 
Always visit http://satish24k.blogspot.com 
Share and Care

Sunday, January 6, 2013

SOPAD


For creating instant reports using MS Word at SOs. Edit the ini file as per your need. 
source:http://srfix.blogspot.in
For latest updates 
Always visit http://satish24k.blogspot.com 
Share and Care

8 legal rights every woman must know


8 legal rights every woman must know



As a woman, you are entitled to some rights by law that protect you when you have been violated. Here are some that you should be aware of.

RIGHT TO PRIVACY WHILE RECORDING STATEMENT
Under section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, a woman who has been raped can record her statement
before the district magistrate when the case is under trial, and no one else needs to be present. Alternatively, she can record the statement with only one police officer and woman constable in a convenient place that is not crowded and does not provide any possibility of the statement being overheard by a fourth person. The police have to, by law, protect the woman’s right to privacy. It’s important for the person to feel comfortable and not be under any kind of stress while narrating the incident.

TIME DOESN’T MATTER
The police cannot refuse to register an FIR even if a considerable period of time has elapsed since the incident of rape or
molestation took place. If the police tells you that they can’t lodge your FIR since you didn’t report it earlier, do not concede. “Rape is a horrifying incident for any woman, so it’s natural for her to go into shock and not want to report it immediately. She may also fear for her safety and the reputation and dignity of her family. For this reason, the Supreme Court has ruled that the police must register an FIR even if there has been a gap between the report and the occurrence of the incident,” says Tariq Abeed, advocate, Supreme Court.

POLICE CAN’T SAY NO
A rape victim can register her police complaint from any police station under the Zero FIR ruling by Supreme Court. “Sometimes,
the police station under which the incident occurs refuses to register the victim’s complaint in order to keep clear of responsibility, and tries sending the victim to another police station. In such cases, she has the right to lodge an FIR at any police station in the city under the Zero FIR ruling. The senior officer will then direct the SHO of the police station concerned to lodge the FIR,” says Abeed. This is a Supreme Court ruling that not many women are aware of, so don’t let the SHO of a police station send you away saying it “doesn’t come under his area”.

NO ARRESTS AFTER SUNSET
According to a Supreme Court ruling, a woman cannot be arrested after sunset and before sunrise. There are many cases of women
being harassed by the police in the wee hours, but all this can be avoided if you exercise the right of being present in the police station only during daytime. “Even if there is a woman constable accompanying the officers, the police can’t arrest a woman at night. In case the woman has committed a serious crime, the police has to get it in writing from the magistrate explaining why the arrest is necessary
during the night,” says Bhaumik.

YOU CAN’T BE CALLED TO THE POLICE STATION
Women cannot be called to the police station for interrogation under Section 160 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This law
provides Indian women the right of not being physically present at the police station for interrogation. “The police can interrogate a
woman at her residence in the presence of a woman constable and family members or friends,” says Abeed. So the next time you’re
called to the police station for queries or interrogation when you have faced any kind of harassment, quote this guideline of the Supreme Court to exercise your right and remind the cops about it.

THE DOCTOR CAN’T DECIDE
Acase of rape can’t be dismissed even if the doctor says rape had not taken place. A victim of rape needs to be medically examined as per Section 164 A of the Criminal Procedure Code, and only the report can act as proof. “A woman has the right to have a copy of the medical report from the doctor. Rape is a crime, not a medical condition. It is a legal term and not a diagnosis to be made by the medical officer treating the victim. The only statement that can be made by the medical officer is that there is evidence of recent sexual activity. Whether the rape has occurred or not is a legal conclusion and the doctor can’t decide on this,” explains Bhaumik.

PROTECT YOUR IDENTITY
Under no circumstances can the identity of a rape victim be revealed. Neither the police nor media can make known the
name of the victim in public. Section 228-A of the Indian Penal Code makes the disclosure of a victim’s identity a punishable offense.
Printing or publishing the name or any matter which may make known the identity of a woman against whom an offense has been committed is punishable. This is done to prevent social victimisation or ostracism of the victim of a sexual offense. Even while a judgment is in progress at the high court or a lower court, the name of the victim is not indicated, she is only described as ‘victim’ in
the judgment.

EMPLOYERS MUST PROTECT
It is the duty of every employer to create a Sexual Harassment Complaints Committee within the organisation for redressal of such complaints. According to a guideline issued by the Supreme Court, it is mandatory for all firms, public and private, to set up these committees to resolve matters of sexual harassment. It is also necessary that the committee be headed by a woman and include 50 per cent women as members. Also, one of the members should be from a women’s welfare group.

Sources: Saumya Bhaumik (women's right lawyer, Tariq Abeed  (advocate, Supreme court)
For latest updates 
Always visit http://satish24k.blogspot.com 
Share and Care

Saturday, January 5, 2013

Re-Exercise of option under Rule 6 of CCS (RP) Rules 2008


Re-Exercise of option under Rule 6 of CCS (RP) Rules 2008 

Click here to view Order No - 10/2/2011-E-III (A) Dated 03.01.2013


Congratulations to comrade Kuppelur N B, Treasurer, Haveri HO and comrade Yeladahalli B B, Sub Postmaster, Rattihalli SO.
Your pay will be re-fixed

For latest updates 
Always visit http://satish24k.blogspot.com 
Share and Care

Friday, January 4, 2013

Introducing a Dedicate Day for attending Pensioners in Person


Introducing a Dedicate Day for attending Pensioners in Person

No. 55/40/2012-P&PW(C)
Government of India 
Ministry of Personnel, P.G. and Pensions 
Department of Pension and Pensioners' Welfare
3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhavan,
New Delhi, the 31st Dec., 2012
OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Introducing a Dedicate Day for attending Pensioners in Person - reg

The undersigned is directed to inform that in order to facilitate mitigation of problems of Central Civil Pensioners, it has been decided that on every Wednesday, concerned officers of the Department of Pension and Pensioners' Welfare will be available between 1500 and 1600 hrs, in person, in Room No. 310, Lok Nayak Bhavan (near Gate No.1) to meet pensioners and, as far as possible, answer the queries/points raised by the pensioners.

2. The Central Civil Pensioners, aggrieved of pension related matters and seeking clarification etc., on application of any of the following rules/regulations may meet the concerned officers of this Department alongwith a written submission, by appearing in person, on the prescribed date, time and venue, and make use of this facility.

3. The rules being administered by the Department are:

(i) CCS(Pension) Rules, 1972;
(ii) CCS(Comrnutation of Pension) Rules, 1981; .
(iii) CCS(Extra-ordinary Pension) Rules;
(iv) GPF(CS)Rules, 1960; and
(v) CPF(India) Rules, 1962.
Sd/-
(Tripti P Ghosh)
Director (PP)

Source: http://ccis.nic.in/WriteReadData/CircularPortal/D3/D03ppw/Day_311212.pdf
For latest updates 
Always visit http://satish24k.blogspot.com 
Share and Care

ORDERS ON GRANT OF INCREMENT TO SPORTS PERSONS


GOVERNMENT IS STILL TO ISSUE ORDERS ON GRANT OF INCREMENT TO SPORTS PERSONS FOR OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENTS AT NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LEVELS'

CONFEDERATION WRITES TO DOPT FOR EXPEDITING THE ISSUE OF ORDERS 

CONFEDERATION OF CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AND WORKERS
Manihsinath Bhawan
A/2/95 Rajouri Garden
New Delhi. 110 027.
Website: confederationhq. Blogspot.com.
E mail:confederation06@yahoo.co.in.

D/14/2012
Dated: 28th December, 2012
 The Secretary, Personnel,
Department of Personnel and Training,
North Block,
New Delhi. 110- 001.

Dear Sir,

Sub: "incentive increments to sports persons for outstanding sports achievements, National and International levels.
Ref: Your letter MNo. 6/2/2008 Pay I dated August, 2008.

Kindly refer to the above cited letter.

The practice of giving incentive increments to the sportsperson who excel was to be replaced with lump sum grant. Views were called for by the Department of Personnel from all Ministries/Departments as also individuals.  We have felt that there was no need to change the existing system as we found to be a better financial benefit in the longer run.  Lumpsum grant however, large it may be will not help the persons who have worked hard in their youthful days. However, we felt that the sportsperson must have a say in the matter.
More than 4 years have passed now.  No views from the Ministries or individuals seem to have been received by the Department of Personnel. Or if received it has not been made known.

It has been represented to us that in the name of changing the entire scheme itself, the incentive increment system was in vogue was discontinued with effect from 1.1.2006.  As you are aware, the scheme was introduced in Government service with effect from 1985 with a view to attract the sports personnel to choose the Government service and more so to encourage them so that they can acquit themselves creditably. 

We, in the circumstances, request that the incentive scheme may be revived and made effective from 1.1.2006. In the case of all allowances which are incentive in character, the Government had doubled the amount after the 6th CPC.  

The action taken in this regard may please be intimated to us.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully, 
K.K.N. Kutty
Secretary General.

Source:  http://confederationhq.blogspot.in/
[http://confederationhq.blogspot.in/2012/12/confederation-writes-to-dopt-on-grant.html]
For latest updates 
Always visit http://satish24k.blogspot.com 
Share and Care

CASUAL LABOURER’S WAGE REVISION CAT ERNAKULAM BENCH GIVES FIRM DIRECTION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF POSTS TO FINALISE THE CASE WITHIN TWO MONTHS AND REPORT TO THE COURT


CASUAL LABOURER’S WAGE REVISION
CAT ERNAKULAM BENCH GIVES FIRM DIRECTION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF POSTS TO FINALISE THE CASE WITHIN TWO MONTHS AND REPORT TO THE COURT

Kerala casual, Part-time, Contingent Employees Federation filed the case in CAT Ernakulam Bench
 Next Case posted on 12.03.2013
 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
ERNAKULAM BENCH
TUESDAY THE 1ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2013

PRESENT

Hon’ble Dr. K. B. S. Rajan                                                                                           : Judicial Member

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 862/2011

Postal Casual, Part-time, Contingent Workers Union                                                : Applicants
Represented by General Secy. N. Sreekantan

Versus

Union of India, Represented by Secy. Ministry of Communication,                          : Respndent
Department of Posts, New Delhi & Others

Mr. Muraleedharan for Mr. TC Govindaswamy                                            : Counsel for Applicant

Mr. A. D. Raveendra Prasad, ACGSC                                                              : Counsel for Respondent


ORDER

For redressal of the grievance of the applicant, a committee was constituted as early as 27 September 2011 and as such, this  has been got adjourned on several occasions. Today, the counsel for the respondents seeks three months more time as the Committee is to be reconstituted in view of the retirement of one of the members. It is not exactly known to the Tribunal as to the stage up to which the committee has reached. As sufficient time has already expired, it is appropriate that two months and no more time is granted for the Committee to arrive at a decision and communicate the same to the applicant. Reply to the OA shall also be filed immediately after arriving at a decision, so that this can be considered accordingly.

In view of the above, the following directions are issued.

(a)   The Committee shall decide the issue within two months from today.
(b)   Reply shall be filed within a week thereafter on the basis of the decision of the committee.

List this case for further consideration on 12.03.2013.

A copy of this order be made available to the counsel for the parties.

Sd/-
K. B. S. Rajan
Judicial Member
 source: NFPE
For latest updates 
Always visit http://satish24k.blogspot.com 
Share and Care

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Facebook Themes